Food inspection · Product trials and line acceptance
The purchase is a working inspection point: the detector must find the agreed test pieces in your food, then keep the affected product out of the accepted flow. A sensitivity number on an empty-belt demonstration does not complete that brief.
For conveyorized food inspection. Foil inspection and other transport arrangements need their own configuration. Named equipment examples below explain purchase decisions; their specifications do not apply to every machine in this category.
01
Bring the final package and laminate specification to the trial. LOMA distinguishes balanced-coil from ferrous-in-foil inspection; metallized film is not the same application as a full aluminium-foil enclosure. [1]
Kenwei describes JW-GL2415 as a magnetic-metal detector for aluminium-foil packs. Its “Sus” headline does not identify a stainless grade or a test condition. Obtain results for your actual ferrous, non-ferrous and stainless challenges before treating that label as coverage of all three. [7]
If the intended metal cannot be detected through the final pack, assess an earlier inspection point or another inspection technology. Any earlier point also leaves the later process to be assessed for new contamination. Choose this as part of the plant’s hazard analysis, not from a catalogue’s broad application list. [4]
Identify the detector, belt, reject arrangement and acceptance protocol in the quotation. The terms “intelligent” and “food grade” do not establish certification.
02
Techik's IMD table illustrates why the aperture and test conditions belong beside the number. These are two configurations from the same 400 mm detection-width group, each with a 360 mm belt. The published results use only a test sample on the belt; Techik explicitly says product, working conditions and speed affect actual sensitivity. [2]
Compare columns side by side. On a narrow screen, scroll the table horizontally.
| Published IMD configuration | Detection height | Fe test diameter | SUS304 test diameter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4008 | 80 mm | 0.5 mm | 1.0 mm [2] |
| 4018 | 180 mm | 0.8 mm | 2.0 mm [2] |
METTLER TOLEDO describes sensitivity using a specified metal sphere passing through the aperture centre, its least-sensitive position. A belt-surface result and a centre-of-aperture result therefore need their positions stated before comparison. Aperture size, product orientation, speed and environment belong in the trial record. [3]
Wet or salty food can itself produce a signal. Include the normal variation in product temperature and composition when agreeing a stable setting and false-reject acceptance. [3]
FDA's seafood guidance gives an orientation example: a detector set for a 2 mm sphere may miss a thinner stainless wire up to 24 mm long if calibration and orientation are unfavourable. This is an example of detection limitations, not a permissible contaminant size. Let the likely contaminant shape inform the trial as well as the sphere diameter. [5]
Techik's table does not give a non-ferrous result for these configurations. Request it; do not calculate it from the Fe or SUS304 column. The delivered system needs documented results with the agreed product, package and setup. [2]
03
A balanced-coil head uses one transmitter and two receivers; passing metal changes the signal processed by the electronics. Its aperture liner is non-metallic. This is a functional assembly reference, not a model-specific manufacturing BOM. [1]
| Assembly | Job on the line | Material or configuration to identify |
|---|---|---|
| Detection head and aperture liner | Creates the inspection zone and supplies the detection signal. | Obtain the head and liner specification. Do not describe the entire aperture as stainless steel. [1] |
| Signal processor and operator interface | Sets the product recipe and handles detection events and outputs. | Identify the controller, software revision, access levels and enclosure. A touchscreen is not proof of an automatic reject system. [4] |
| Product transport | Presents the product at the agreed position and speed. | Techik lists a food-grade PU belt with chain conveyor as an option. Record the supplied belt material and obtain its applicable food-contact documentation. [2] |
| Reject or controlled-stop assembly | Separates the affected product, or stops the line for controlled removal. | Confirm the supplied mechanism, guards, reject container, sensors and air requirements. These are configuration items, not one universal pneumatic assembly. [4] |
Specify who supplies and commissions each assembly. A search head purchased for an existing conveyor leaves transport and reject integration to be resolved; a complete-system offer must identify what is actually included.
04
Techik's standard IMD description is alarm and belt stop, with a rejecter optional. Treat that as a different operating arrangement from a conveyor that continues while an automatic device removes the affected pack. Agree the removal and restart procedure before ordering. [2]
LOMA tests the leading and trailing ends of a pack and observes entry into the reject bin. This checks removal timing as well as detection. Agree the pack spacing and speeds to witness. [1]
Demonstrate the agreed response to failed rejection, low air pressure, detector fault and a full bin. LOMA describes confirmation sensors and belt-stop safeguards. Record the fault response and who may restart production. [1]
Identify the test packs and account for their test pieces before releasing production. Keep test material distinct from saleable food. Record recipe, speed, challenge identity, result and any corrective action in the site's verification procedure. [4]
FDA's seafood guidance includes a four-hour challenge interval in its example control strategy, alongside startup, changes and end-of-processing checks. It is not a universal interval for every food line. Establish the applicable interval and affected-product procedure with the site's food-safety team and customer requirements. [5]
05
LOMA's IQ4 conveyor sheet, document IQ4_V2_893202205, separates three protection statements. Keep them separate when comparing a washdown quotation. These are named-document values, not ratings for the Chinese suppliers listed below. [6]
| IQ4 sheet item | Published rating | Purchase consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Conveyor system | IP66 | Confirm the delivered system configuration. [6] |
| Detection head | IP69K | A head rating does not upgrade every attached component. [6] |
| Air preparation unit | IP65; IP69 option | Identify which option is in the quotation. [6] |
Describe water temperature and pressure, cleaning agents, exposure and required access. The same IQ4 sheet lists 0–40°C ambient and 0–95% RH, non-condensing; those operating conditions are not wash-water limits. Its electrical entry gives 230 V/50 Hz or 110 V/60 Hz, single phase, and 3.0 A. Amperes are not a kilowatt rating. [6]
Obtain the selected head's metal-free-zone drawing before placing nearby metalwork. Clearance depends on the detector design; don't adopt a universal distance. Include adjacent drives, vibration, transfer points and maintenance access in the line review. [4]
Kenwei's GL2415 page gives 1570 × 880 × 1490 mm and 170 kg near the top, but 1450 × 850 × 1620 mm and 160 kg in its lower table. Resolve the actual ordered build with a signed arrangement drawing; do not choose one set silently. [7]
06
Complete these purchasing fields for the selected configuration. Where a public document supplies no value, request the supplier's current drawing or declaration instead of filling the gap with a category-wide range.
| Field | Put this on the order or test record |
|---|---|
| Aperture | Clear width and height, belt thickness, pack envelope and orientation; distinguish aperture width from belt width. |
| Non-ferrous sensitivity | Test metal, sphere diameter, test-piece identity and placement, actual product and recipe. Include a separate Fe challenge. |
| Stainless sensitivity | Alloy and sphere diameter, placement and product condition; include any agreed wire or fragment challenge. |
| Ingress protection | Ratings and evidence for the head, conveyor, controls, sensors and air preparation; cleaning regime. |
| Removal arrangement | Controlled stop or exact automatic reject type; confirmation, collection and failure/restart behaviour. |
| Conveyor speed | Minimum, normal and maximum speed, pack spacing and mass; show which conditions were witnessed. |
| Detection performance | Document successful challenges and agreed repeatability/false-reject criteria. A positional ±mm value does not state contaminant sensitivity. |
| Temperature | Product temperature and permitted equipment ambient, plus separate cleaning exposure. |
| Humidity | Ambient range and condensation conditions at the installation. |
| Electrical supply | Voltage, phase, frequency, earth and connection details for the complete supplied system. |
| Electrical and air demand | Installed load/current and the rejector's compressed-air demand; keep the quantities and units separate. |
| Materials | Housing grade, food-contact belt/liner materials and applicable declarations for the delivered parts. |
| Mass | Net installed mass and lifting/handling information for the selected build. |
| Installed envelope | Approved arrangement, line height, reject-bin access, guards, service space and head clearance zone. |
The schedule is a CNFX purchasing worksheet, not a manufacturer specification. Its trial fields follow the source discussions above; acceptance values must be agreed for the actual line.
07
Paste it into your enquiry below or into an email to a maker, then replace every bracket.
Food / recipe variants: [product; wet/dry; temperature and normal variation] Packaging: [material/laminate; sealed sample; dimensions and orientation] Line duty: [pack mass; spacing; minimum/normal/maximum speed] Inspection point: [before/after final pack; downstream contamination risks] Challenges: [Fe; named non-ferrous; stainless alloy; sizes and test-piece identities] Trial conditions: [placements; repeat passes; acceptance and false-reject criteria] Removal: [controlled stop or automatic reject; bin; confirmation; fault response] Installation: [line height; available space; transfers; nearby metalwork/drives] Utilities / cleaning: [electrical supply; air; ambient; wash and chemical exposure] Evidence: [signed configuration; arrangement; materials; test report; operating and maintenance instructions] Witness / handover: [trial samples; factory/site test; training; records; responsible approvers]
Conveyor, foil, pipeline and combination systems have different briefs. The companies below are described from their public product pages, not factory audits or a guarantee that your acceptance test will pass.
Lists the IMD conveyor family. The source distinguishes alarm/stop from optional rejection and qualifies its sensitivity figures as test-sample-only belt results. Request the actual-food trial and the precise reject configuration.
Product scope checked 2026-10-10
Lists G3012, G5020, GL2415 foil and gravity-feed equipment. The GL2415 page describes magnetic-metal inspection; its two dimension/weight blocks conflict. Obtain a signed build drawing and metal-specific trial results.
Product scope checked 2026-10-10
GL2415 configuration and conflicting dimensions ↗
Publishes ZL-4001A conveyor equipment with optional rejection, alongside pipeline and head-only products. Its 4001A introduction mentions foil, while the application table specifies non-metallic packaging. Resolve that scope with the proposed pack and test pieces before ordering.
Product scope checked 2026-10-10
Lists NG-706A conveyor, NG-7067 combined checkweighing, NG-706F foil and pipeline offers. It requests product and contaminant details for sample testing. Quote the transport and rejection arrangement explicitly.
Product scope checked 2026-10-10
Lists conveyor inspection with optional rejection. The examined page mixes CN-520 and SA-990 identifiers and conflicting specification blocks. Request one current configuration sheet and witnessed product trial; its broad sensitivity headline is not a guarantee across every aperture and food.
Product scope checked 2026-10-10
Explore company information and manufacturing capabilities, then discuss the scope of your project with a relevant supplier.
No. FDA's example seafood control strategy considers product made since the controls were last confirmed to be functioning. Your procedure must identify, hold and evaluate the affected production and define how control is restored. Passing a later test does not by itself release the earlier product. [5]
No. Its header identifies CN-520 while its technical blocks identify SA-990; the blocks also give different supply voltages and recipe capacities. It establishes an equipment offering, but a quotation needs one identified model and controlled specification. The inconsistent temperature and humidity entries should not be copied into a purchase order. [8]
Not from the category reviewed. Its industrial-metal-detector category lists wall/stud finders and underground metal-search equipment, which are different instruments from a conveyorised food-line detector. Ask any supplier for a named food-line model and test-piece results. [9]
Sources checked 2026-10-10. Sources support named configurations and the stated inspection principles. Product pages do not establish the delivered machine's performance, certification or hygienic suitability. Original paid standards and retailer codes were not reviewed.
Ask for use case, specification boundaries, supplier type, and RFQ preparation information for this product.
Compare manufacturer profiles with relevant product and process capability.