Servo-hydraulic presses for precision stamping · Servo-pump drive versus valve control, overshoot, stroke rate, energy use, slide parallelism and checking the drive type behind a 'hydraulic' label
This page covers hydraulic stamping presses whose pump is driven by a speed-controlled servo motor, used for progressive-die stamping, punching, embossing and deep drawing where stroke control and repeatability matter. Ask three things first: how the drive controls pressure and flow and what overshoot and stroke rate it achieves, how slide parallelism and positioning are held under off-centre load, and what energy use and maintenance the supplier claims against a conventional hydraulic press.
Servo-hydraulic (servo-pump) presses for precision stamping, punching, embossing and deep drawing. General-purpose hydraulic presses in C-frame, H-frame and four-column designs, including conventional valve-controlled presses, are covered on the Hydraulic press page. Mechanical crank and knuckle stamping presses, servo-mechanical presses and press brakes are outside this page.
01
In a servo-pump system, pressure and flow rate are controlled by a servomotor's torque and speed rather than by the choking effect of valves, so energy is supplied only when needed at the cylinder. In a project reported by Siemens, press builder Exner Pressentechnologie, which makes hydraulic presses of 200–30,000 kN, converted a press from servo-valve technology to a servo-pump driven through a Sinamics S120 drive: energy consumption fell by 50%, overshoot during adjustment fell from 10–15% on its standard presses to around 1%, and the stroke rate rose from 20 to 40 strokes per minute. [1]
In that installation ram positioning is left to Exner's own control system, which sends a speed set point to the servo-pump instead of driving a proportional valve; the control system uses a Simatic S7-315F failsafe PLC, and Siemens states the system meets safety requirements up to SIL 3 to IEC 61508 and PL e to ISO 13849-1. Less heat transfers into the structure, so less needs to be dissipated. [1]
AP&T states that its Servohydraulic® press consumes half as much energy as a conventional hydraulic press, consumes no energy when idle, has acceleration and deceleration forces 250% higher, and needs about 30% less maintenance; for its version for progressive die stamping, punching, embossing and deep drawing, built with transmission cylinder technology, it gives energy consumption up to 80% lower than a corresponding conventional AP&T hydraulic press on short and medium strokes. [2] Editorial calculation: doubling the stroke rate from 20 to 40 per minute cuts the cycle from 3.0 s to 1.5 s. [1]
Give the supplier the parts and dies (progressive, transfer or single-stage), material and thickness, required force and where in the stroke it is needed, stroke length, strokes per minute, the positioning and parallelism you need, and your energy price and duty cycle.
02
AP&T states that its servo-hydraulic process can be controlled with "a great deal of precision and a high degree of parallelism between the press table and slide", that press force stays consistently high during the entire cycle and can be distributed precisely even over small surfaces, that the cushion can be pre-accelerated for sensitive materials, and that the high parallelism reduces tooling wear. [2]
Editorial note: AP&T gives no numeric parallelism value on that page; ask each supplier for slide-to-bolster parallelism and bottom-dead-centre repeatability as numbers, with the load, position and method used to measure them. [2]
Check the drive behind a 'hydraulic' label. Howfit's DDL-300T is listed as a "High Speed Hydraulic Stamping Press" of 3,000 kN with a 30 mm stroke, 100–450 SPM, 2,300 × 1,000 mm bolster and JIS special-grade accuracy, but the same page describes a crankshaft in NiCrMo alloy steel, a clutch and brake, and hydraulic preloading of the tie-rod frame, which describes a mechanical high-speed press. [3] Ask which component drives the slide before comparing stroke rates.
03
Results come from different machines and duty cycles; use them to frame questions, not as guarantees.
| Machine or project | Published result | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Exner press with Siemens servo-pump | 50% energy saving; overshoot ~1% (from 10–15%); 20 → 40 strokes/min. [1] | Retrofit from servo-valve control. [1] |
| AP&T Servohydraulic® press | Half the energy; 250% higher acceleration/deceleration force; ~30% less maintenance. [2] | Compared with conventional hydraulic press. [2] |
| AP&T version for progressive dies | Up to 80% lower energy on short and medium strokes. [2] | Compared with corresponding AP&T conventional press. [2] |
| Howfit DDL-300T (labelled hydraulic) | 3,000 kN; 30 mm stroke; 100–450 SPM. [3] | Crankshaft, clutch and brake listed. [3] |
04
| Module | Role | Fix in the order |
|---|---|---|
| Servo motor and pump | Sets pressure and flow by torque and speed. [1] | Pump type; motor rating. |
| Drive system | Variable-speed drive, e.g. Sinamics S120 in the Exner case. [1] | Drive and regeneration. |
| Press control | Positions the ram; sends speed set point to the pump. [1] | Controller; safety level. |
| Cylinders | Transmission cylinder technology in AP&T's progressive-die version. [2] | Cylinder layout. |
| Slide and bolster | Parallelism to the table under load. [2] | Size; parallelism value. |
| Cushion | Can be pre-accelerated for sensitive materials. [2] | Cushion force and stroke. |
05
| Field | What it means and published values | Ask the supplier for |
|---|---|---|
| Rated Force (kN) | Exner builds 200–30,000 kN hydraulic presses. [1] | Force and where it is available. |
| Stroke Length (mm) | Short and medium strokes favour the AP&T progressive version. [2] | Stroke and adjustment. |
| Table Size (mm) | Bolster area for your dies. | Bolster and slide sizes. |
| Shut Height (mm) | Die height range. | Range and adjustment. |
| Press Speed (SPM) | 20 → 40 strokes/min after the servo-pump retrofit. [1] | Rate at your stroke. |
| Position Accuracy (mm) | Overshoot ~1% after retrofit. [1] | BDC repeatability and method. |
| Parallelism Accuracy (mm) | High parallelism claimed, no value stated. [2] | Value, load and method. |
| Motor Power (kW) | Servo motor rating. | Rating and peak. |
| Operating Pressure (MPa) | System pressure. | Value. |
| Oil Tank Capacity (L) | AP&T states less hydraulic fluid than a conventional press. [2] | Volume and fluid type. |
| Noise Level (dB(A)) | AP&T states a very low noise level. [2] | Measured level. |
| Machine Weight (t) | Foundation load. | Weight. |
| Overall Dimensions (mm) | Floor and height. | Layout. |
06
Paste it into your enquiry below or into an email to a maker, then replace every bracket.
Parts: [material; thickness; size] Dies: [progressive; transfer; single-stage] Force: [kN; position in stroke] Stroke: [length; strokes per minute] Precision: [BDC repeatability; parallelism] Energy: [duty cycle; energy price] Safety: [required SIL/PL]
Manufacturer profiles associated with Precision Hydraulic Stamping Press.
Explore company information and manufacturing capabilities, then discuss the scope of your project with a relevant supplier.
In the Exner–Siemens retrofit, energy use fell by 50%, overshoot fell from 10–15% to about 1%, and stroke rate rose from 20 to 40 per minute. [1]
AP&T states half the energy of a conventional hydraulic press, and up to 80% less for its progressive-die version on short and medium strokes. [2]
Check the drive: Howfit's DDL-300T is labelled hydraulic but lists a crankshaft, clutch and brake and 100–450 SPM. [3]
Sources checked 2026-10-12. Siemens reports a customer project; AP&T and Howfit describe their own presses.
Ask for use case, specification boundaries, supplier type, and RFQ preparation information for this product.
Compare manufacturer profiles with relevant product and process capability.