Fish filleting machines · Fish species and size range, capacity in fish per minute, circular and band knife cutting, automatic size adjustment, back and belly trimming, yield monitoring, water, power and hygiene
An industrial fish filleting machine takes headed and gutted fish on an infeed, measures or guides each fish, and cuts the two fillets away from the backbone with circular knives, band knives or disc blades, sometimes trimming back and belly in the same pass, before the fillets move on to pin-boning, skinning or portioning. Ask three things first: which species and size range it must fillet, what capacity and yield it delivers on your fish, and what infeed, trimming, cleaning and utilities the line needs.
Machines that cut fillets from whole headed and gutted fish, for salmon, trout, whitefish and freshwater species, with their infeed and trimming options. Deheaders, gutting machines, pin-bone removers, skinners, portion cutters and complete fish processing lines are outside this page except where integrated.
01
Marel's salmon filleting brochure (2019) lists two machines for salmon and trout: the MS 2730 for 1.5–8 kg fish at up to 25 fish per minute, or up to 20 with trim tools, using 7.0 kW of power, 15 L/min of water and weighing about 1,450 kg (1,780 kg with trim tools); and the CT 2630 for 2–7 kg fish at up to 20 fish per minute, using 4.0 kW, 10 L/min and weighing about 675 kg. Both have integrated compressors and run on three-phase supply. [1]
The MS 2730 capacity is stated for an average fish of 4 kg and 670 mm length, and the brochure says throughput depends on fish length. [1]
For small-scale freshwater processing, Jayraj and Machavaram (IIT Kharagpur, World Aquaculture 2025) report a rohu filleting machine with two parallel disc blades, belt conveying and water spraying, tested on 300–2,000 g fish, that reached 33 ± 1 fish per minute, 82.48 ± 0.97% overall filleting efficiency and 93.16 ± 0.28 Wh energy use, with sensory scores of 4–5 out of 5 for fillet quality. [2]
Editorial calculation: 25 fish per minute at an average 4 kg is 6,000 kg of whole fish an hour, and 15 L/min of water is 900 L an hour; size the upstream deheading and downstream trimming for that rate, and ask for capacity at your fish size, not the maximum.
Give the supplier the species, fish size and length range, condition (pre-rigor or post-rigor, headed and gutted), required capacity, trim specification, infeed type (manual or automatic), downstream processes, yield-measurement needs, power and water supply, cleaning regime, floor space and quantities.
02
The brochure describes the CT 2630 as feeding fish belly up into band knives that adjust to fish size and shape, with circular knives cutting close to the backbone and four sets of finger pressures for the belly-bone cut on pre-rigor and post-rigor fish. The MS 2730 takes fish belly down, measures each fish's profile and size to adjust electronically controlled tools, and adds a set of circular knives from vent to tail so meat close to the centre bone stays on the fillet. [1]
Optional back and belly trimming tools on the MS 2730 cut based on the fish height measured at the infeed; an automatic infeed or pace infeeder presents fish upright at the machine's rate. A yield control station weighs whole fish and then heads, frames, belly trim and fillets per batch to report total yield, and software records fish dimensions, fillet counts and alarms. The machines are stainless steel with materials described as FDA-approved. [1]
Editorial note: yield depends on species, size, condition and trim specification; ask the supplier for a yield trial on your own fish, measured by batch weights from whole fish to fillets.
03
Baader's US patent 8,814,637 (Nordischer Maschinenbau Rud. Baader; priority 31 May 2010, granted 26 August 2014) describes the filleting stage for headed and gutted fish: an endlessly rotating conveyor carries transport saddles, each fish lies with its backbone on the saddle's supporting edge, back up and tail first, and passes between a lower pair of circular blades that cut the belly bones free and an upper pair that cut the back bones free, the two blades of each pair running left and right of the backbone on axes transverse to the direction of travel. [3]
The patent explains that when both blades of a pair turn the same way, the cutting forces push the flesh outwards and pull the fish along the saddle, so holding elements such as fangs are needed and the fish can still be mispositioned for later cuts. Its answer is to drive the two blades of each pair in opposite directions, so one retards and the other accelerates the fish and the forces cancel; diagonally opposite blades of the upper and lower pairs share a direction of rotation. [3]
The preferred blades of each pair are angled so they are closest together where they enter the fish, to cut as close as possible to the backbone, and the upper and lower pairs may run at the same speed or at different speeds. [3] Editorial note: ask the supplier how its blades are driven and angled, how fish are held on the saddle, and for fillet yield and backbone-meat results from a trial on your species and size, since the patent itself gives no yield figures.
04
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 309, prepared by the Torry Research Station (Aberdeen) for FAO in 1989, compiles published yields of skinless fillets and total edible flesh as a percentage of whole fish weight. It warns that the term ‘fillet’ is used in the literature without saying whether skin is present or how far belly flaps and pin bones were trimmed, and where fillets were known or suspected to include skin it subtracted 5% of the fillet yield. [4]
FAO marks values in square brackets as resting on limited data: for Pacific salmon the 50% skinless fillet figure is the only one found in the literature, and for tilapias the fillet value is borrowed from related groups. The yields above are per whole fish, while the Baader patent describes filleting beheaded and eviscerated fish, so convert both to the same basis before comparing a supplier's yield claim. [4] [3]
Editorial calculation: at the MS 2730's 25 fish per minute and its 4 kg reference fish, 100 kg of fish enters the machine each minute, so each percentage point of fillet yield is 1 kg of fillet per minute, or 60 kg per hour. Ask the supplier for a yield trial on your own fish, stating skin-on or skinless, trim level and the weight basis. [1]
| Species (FAO FTP 309) | Selected skinless fillet yield (% of whole weight) | Selected edible flesh (% of whole weight) | Machine-related data reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic cod | 34 [4] | 47 [4] | Skin-on fillets cut by machine: 40–47.2% (mean 45.5%) of gutted, head-on weight [4] |
| Haddock | 35 [4] | 48 [4] | — |
| Alaska pollack | 36 [4] | 41 [4] | Single batch filleted by machine, trimmed and skinned: 19.7% fillet [4] |
| Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) | [50] [4] | 62 [4] | — |
| Tilapias | [37] [4] | 37 [4] | 40.1% edible flesh by deboning machine (T. nilotica) [4] |
05
This page lists no checked filleting machine maker yet. Ask each bidder for capacity at your own fish size rather than the maximum — Marel states its MS 2730 rating for a 4 kg, 670 mm fish — and for a yield trial on your fish weighed batch by batch. [1]
06
The three sources cut in three different ways: Marel combines band and circular knives, the rohu prototype uses two parallel disc blades, and Baader drives each blade pair in opposite directions so the cutting forces cancel. [1] [2] [3]
| Part | Role | Fix in the order |
|---|---|---|
| Infeed | Presents fish in position. [1] [2] | Manual or automatic, orientation. |
| Conveyor with transport saddles | Carries fish backbone-down, tail first. [3] | Saddle size for your fish. |
| Size measurement | Sets tool positions. [1] | Measurement method. |
| Band and circular knives or disc blades | Cut fillets from the backbone; belly and back blade pairs. [1] [2] [3] | Knife type, grinding. |
| Belly and back trim tools | Trim fillets to specification. [1] | Options. |
| Water spray | Cleans blades and eases flow. [1] [2] | Consumption. |
| Controls and data | Programs and yield reports. [1] | Touch screen, software. |
07
Read the yield row against the FAO benchmarks only on the same basis: FAO's figures are skinless fillets as a share of whole fish, while the rohu prototype reports a filleting efficiency. [4] [2]
| Field | What it means and published values | Ask the supplier for |
|---|---|---|
| Fish size range (kg) | 1.5–8 or 2–7 kg salmon; 0.3–2 kg rohu. [1] [2] | Range for your species. |
| Capacity (fish/min) | Up to 25 or 20 for salmon; 33 for rohu. [1] [2] | Capacity at your size. |
| Filleting efficiency or yield (%) | 82.48% filleting efficiency for rohu. [2] Published species benchmarks: skinless fillets 34% of whole weight for Atlantic cod, 35% for haddock, [50%] for Pacific salmon. [4] | Yield trial on your fish. |
| Power (kW) | 7.0 or 4.0 kW. [1] | Connected load. |
| Water (L/min) | 15 or 10 L/min. [1] | Consumption. |
| Electrical supply | 3 × 400 V or 3 × 220 V. [1] | Supply. |
| Weight (kg) | About 675–1,780 kg. [1] | Weight and footprint. |
| Materials and hygiene | Stainless steel, FDA-approved materials stated. [1] | Material certificates, cleaning method. |
08
Paste it into your enquiry below or into an email to a maker, then replace every bracket.
Fish: [species; size; length; condition] Capacity: [fish/min; kg/h] Cutting: [trim specification; pin-bone] Line: [infeed; downstream; yield control] Utilities: [power; water; air] Supply: [footprint; cleaning; quantity]
Manufacturer profiles associated with Industrial Fish Filleting Machine.
Explore company information and manufacturing capabilities, then discuss the scope of your project with a relevant supplier.
One maker lists up to 25 salmon per minute (20 with trim tools); a small-scale rohu machine reached 33 per minute. [1] [2]
One maker lists 15 L/min and 10 L/min for its two salmon machines. [1]
By weighing whole fish and then heads, frames, trims and fillets per batch, as in one maker's yield control station. [1]
Baader's US patent 8,814,637 drives the two blades of each pair oppositely so their cutting forces cancel and the fish stays in position on the saddle without extra holding elements. [3]
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 309 selects skinless fillet yields of 34% of whole weight for Atlantic cod, 35% for haddock, 36% for Alaska pollack and about 50% for Pacific salmon, and notes that published fillet definitions vary. [4]
Sources checked 2026-10-11. Marel's brochure describes its own machines and is used here to show what a filleting machine specification covers; Baader's patent describes its own blade arrangement; the IIT Kharagpur abstract reports tests of a research prototype. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 309 compiles published species yields. Values for your plant must come from trials on your own fish.
Ask for use case, specification boundaries, supplier type, and RFQ preparation information for this product.
Compare manufacturer profiles with relevant product and process capability.